Apex Trader Funding vs TakeProfitTrader: Which Prop Firm Wins?
Compare Apex Trader Funding vs TakeProfitTrader — cost, rules, profit splits, payouts, and which prop firm suits your trading style.
Apex Trader Funding vs TakeProfitTrader: At a glance
Apex Trader Funding is a us futures prop firm running a single-step evaluation, with profit targets of 6% and a max drawdown of 4%. TakeProfitTrader operates in the us futures market with a single-step pro challenge, 6% profit target, and 4% drawdown. The two firms attract different types of traders — Apex suits traders who want fast scaling, multiple accounts, no time pressure, while TakeProfit is generally better for traders who want tradingview-native execution. The full side-by-side comparison is below.
Evaluation structure
Apex Trader Funding's evaluation is a single-step evaluation with a typical cost around $147. You need to hit 6% profit without breaching a 4% drawdown or the daily loss rule (None on eval; trailing EOD drawdown on funded). TakeProfitTrader runs a single-step pro challenge at roughly $150, with a 6% target, 4% drawdown, and none on eval; trailing drawdown on funded. Neither firm is strictly harder — the right one depends on your style. Short-time-frame scalpers usually prefer firms with no daily loss limit on the evaluation. Swing traders who hold overnight need a firm that allows overnight holds.
Payouts and scaling
Once funded, Apex Trader Funding pays out on a on-demand after 8 winning days cadence with a 100% on first $25k, 90% after split. TakeProfitTrader pays bi-weekly after 5 winning days at 80% up to $25k, 90% after, 100% on first $10k. Apex Trader Funding's scaling model: Up to 20 accounts, no scaling plan required. TakeProfitTrader: Standard accounts, single payout threshold. If you want to compound quickly across many accounts, the firm with broader scaling rules is usually the better fit — but faster scaling also means more capital at risk if you overtrade.
Which should you pick?
Pick Apex Trader Funding if traders who want fast scaling, multiple accounts, no time pressure — its trade-offs (trailing drawdown is strict on funded accounts) matter less for that profile. Pick TakeProfitTrader if traders who want tradingview-native execution — the trade-off there is that bi-weekly payouts slower than peers. If you can't decide, the cheapest way to learn is to practice the shape of both rule sets in a simulator first, then pay for a real evaluation once you have a feel for the pace.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | Apex Trader Funding | TakeProfitTrader |
|---|---|---|
| Market | US futures | US futures |
| Evaluation | Single-step evaluation | Single-step PRO challenge |
| Min account | $25,000 | $25,000 |
| Max account | $300,000 | $150,000 |
| Typical cost | ~$147 | ~$150 |
| Profit target | 6% | 6% |
| Max drawdown | 4% | 4% |
| Daily loss limit | None on eval; trailing EOD drawdown on funded | None on eval; trailing drawdown on funded |
| Profit split | 100% on first $25k, 90% after | 80% up to $25k, 90% after, 100% on first $10k |
| Payout frequency | On-demand after 8 winning days | Bi-weekly after 5 winning days |
| Time limit | None | None |
| News trading | Allowed | Allowed |
| Overnight holds | Not allowed | Not allowed |
| Platforms | Rithmic, Tradovate, NinjaTrader | Tradovate, NinjaTrader, TradingView |
| Best for | Traders who want fast scaling, multiple accounts, no time pressure | Traders who want TradingView-native execution |